[WIP] Re-shaping the canonical variant array to support more general …#7494
[WIP] Re-shaping the canonical variant array to support more general …#7494
Conversation
3630cef to
5e6dd39
Compare
Merging this PR will degrade performance by 24.96%
|
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | WallTime | dynamic_dispatch_f32[10M] |
165.9 µs | 113.7 µs | +45.95% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search[(0.005, 0.05)] |
167.5 µs | 131.1 µs | +27.79% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search[(0.005, 0.5)] |
1.5 ms | 1.2 ms | +31.03% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search[(0.005, 0.1)] |
319.7 µs | 246.9 µs | +29.5% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search[(0.005, 1.0)] |
3.1 ms | 2.3 ms | +31.25% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search[(0.01, 0.05)] |
178.7 µs | 142.2 µs | +25.61% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search[(0.01, 0.1)] |
340.6 µs | 267.8 µs | +27.2% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search[(0.01, 0.5)] |
1.6 ms | 1.3 ms | +28.57% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search[(0.1, 0.5)] |
2.2 ms | 1.8 ms | +20.42% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search[(0.01, 1.0)] |
3.3 ms | 2.5 ms | +28.77% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search_chunked[(0.005, 0.1)] |
383.4 µs | 321.6 µs | +19.22% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search[(0.1, 0.05)] |
248.4 µs | 212 µs | +17.21% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search_chunked[(0.005, 1.0)] |
3.7 ms | 3.1 ms | +20.16% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search_chunked[(0.1, 1.0)] |
4.9 ms | 4.2 ms | +14.62% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search_chunked[(0.01, 0.5)] |
2 ms | 1.7 ms | +18.61% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search_chunked[(0.005, 0.5)] |
1.9 ms | 1.5 ms | +20.05% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search_chunked[(0.1, 0.1)] |
518.3 µs | 456.3 µs | +13.58% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search_chunked[(0.01, 1.0)] |
3.9 ms | 3.3 ms | +18.72% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search[(0.1, 0.1)] |
458.1 µs | 385.2 µs | +18.94% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search_chunked[(0.01, 0.05)] |
212.7 µs | 181.8 µs | +16.98% |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.
Comparing adamg/variant-array (ca552b5) with develop (e2062a7)
932cc69 to
330c582
Compare
4edbac7 to
1289c1e
Compare
…forms of shredding Signed-off-by: Adam Gutglick <adam@spiraldb.com>
Signed-off-by: Adam Gutglick <adam@spiraldb.com>
Signed-off-by: Adam Gutglick <adam@spiraldb.com>
Signed-off-by: Adam Gutglick <adam@spiraldb.com>
Signed-off-by: Adam Gutglick <adam@spiraldb.com>
Signed-off-by: Adam Gutglick <adam@spiraldb.com>
Signed-off-by: Adam Gutglick <adam@spiraldb.com>
f97b78e to
d927bfd
Compare
Signed-off-by: Adam Gutglick <adam@spiraldb.com>
|
@claude review this PR |
|
Claude encountered an error —— View job I'll analyze this and get back to you. |
Signed-off-by: Adam Gutglick <adam@spiraldb.com>
Signed-off-by: Adam Gutglick <adam@spiraldb.com>
No description provided.