Feature or enhancement
Has this already been discussed elsewhere?
No response given
Links to previous discussion of this feature:
No response
Proposal:
Buildbots and GitHub Actions run the Python test suite with --verbose2 option to re-run failed tests in verbose mode. The current regrtest implementation is the re-run tests in the main process. It is not reliable: if a test crash or timeout, the main process cannot get back the control since the process is killed. Usually, there is no final report after the test is re-run, and the output is just "truncated".
I propose to re-run failed tests in subprocesses to make them more reliable:
- Each test file is run in a fresh process and so does not inherit the state of previously executed tests. It runs in a known and reproducible state: threads, signals, etc.
- The main process can kill the worker process if it hangs.
- If faulthandler kills a worker process on a timeout, the main control detects it and continues its regular work.
- Same if a worker process is killed because of a fatal error: Python Fatal Error, segmentation fault, etc.
- Regular regrtest features can be re-used, like detection of leaking temporary files.
I'm working on an implementation.
Linked PRs
Feature or enhancement
Has this already been discussed elsewhere?
No response given
Links to previous discussion of this feature:
No response
Proposal:
Buildbots and GitHub Actions run the Python test suite with
--verbose2option to re-run failed tests in verbose mode. The current regrtest implementation is the re-run tests in the main process. It is not reliable: if a test crash or timeout, the main process cannot get back the control since the process is killed. Usually, there is no final report after the test is re-run, and the output is just "truncated".I propose to re-run failed tests in subprocesses to make them more reliable:
I'm working on an implementation.
Linked PRs