Skip to content

chore: remove api_id_override from librarian.yaml#16798

Open
jskeet wants to merge 2 commits intogoogleapis:mainfrom
jskeet:remove-api-id-override
Open

chore: remove api_id_override from librarian.yaml#16798
jskeet wants to merge 2 commits intogoogleapis:mainfrom
jskeet:remove-api-id-override

Conversation

@jskeet
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jskeet jskeet commented Apr 24, 2026

@jskeet jskeet requested a review from daniel-sanche April 24, 2026 13:50
@jskeet jskeet requested review from a team as code owners April 24, 2026 13:50
@jskeet jskeet requested review from chelsea-lin and removed request for a team April 24, 2026 13:50
@jskeet
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jskeet commented Apr 24, 2026

@daniel-sanche I believe this one will just be safe to merge.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates API IDs across multiple packages and the central librarian configuration, often replacing generic IDs with more specific service endpoints. However, the refactoring of the system test execution logic in the Spanner noxfile.py introduces several regressions, such as duplicated test execution when using positional arguments, the removal of necessary asyncio configuration flags, and the merging of sync and async test runs. It is recommended to revert the changes to the noxfile and address that refactoring in a separate pull request.

Comment thread packages/google-cloud-spanner/noxfile.py Outdated
@jskeet jskeet requested a review from parthea April 24, 2026 16:19
@jskeet jskeet force-pushed the remove-api-id-override branch from 86e24ac to f3767d8 Compare April 24, 2026 17:16
@jskeet jskeet enabled auto-merge (squash) April 24, 2026 17:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants