Always run CI checks#17538
Merged
blaginin merged 6 commits intoapache:mainfrom Sep 17, 2025
Merged
Conversation
findepi
approved these changes
Sep 17, 2025
Comment on lines
+832
to
+855
| needs: [ linux-rustdoc, | ||
| linux-wasm-pack, | ||
| linux-build-lib, | ||
| macos-aarch64, | ||
| vendor, | ||
| check-fmt, | ||
| msrv, | ||
| linux-datafusion-common-features, | ||
| linux-datafusion-substrait-features, | ||
| linux-datafusion-proto-features, | ||
| linux-cargo-check-datafusion, | ||
| linux-cargo-check-datafusion-functions, | ||
| linux-test, | ||
| linux-test-example, | ||
| linux-test-doc, | ||
| verify-benchmark-results, | ||
| sqllogictest-postgres, | ||
| sqllogictest-substrait, | ||
| test-datafusion-pyarrow, | ||
| clippy, | ||
| cargo-toml-formatting-checks, | ||
| linux-test-datafusion-cli, | ||
| config-docs-check | ||
| ] |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we should have a test (eg in rust, using a yaml parser) to validate this list is complete.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
agreed! will add on top
Humbedooh
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 17, 2025
github-merge-queue Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2026
) Related to #6880 Follow up on #17538 Bringing back the merge queues 🤞🏻 Last time it was painful because: - there was no `.asf.yaml` validation - if something goes wrong, we weren't able to force merge without the infra team this PR solved the first problem. As for the second one, I have the permissions to bypass so should be able to quickly revert if something ever goes bad <img width="830" height="151" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/62fb2bb5-44d8-4aae-a006-188d96728140" /> Check result: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/actions/runs/23715604583/job/69082077684?pr=21239 I also checked that CI will keep working by [merging](apache/datafusion-sandbox#197) this into our sandbox and then opening and merging [a dummy pr](apache/datafusion-sandbox#204) For now, bringing just the basic checks (in dev.yml). Will do rust.yml separately if everything goes smoothly after this one is merged
zhuqi-lucas
pushed a commit
to zhuqi-lucas/arrow-datafusion
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2026
…che#21239) Related to apache#6880 Follow up on apache#17538 Bringing back the merge queues 🤞🏻 Last time it was painful because: - there was no `.asf.yaml` validation - if something goes wrong, we weren't able to force merge without the infra team this PR solved the first problem. As for the second one, I have the permissions to bypass so should be able to quickly revert if something ever goes bad <img width="830" height="151" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/62fb2bb5-44d8-4aae-a006-188d96728140" /> Check result: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/actions/runs/23715604583/job/69082077684?pr=21239 I also checked that CI will keep working by [merging](apache/datafusion-sandbox#197) this into our sandbox and then opening and merging [a dummy pr](apache/datafusion-sandbox#204) For now, bringing just the basic checks (in dev.yml). Will do rust.yml separately if everything goes smoothly after this one is merged
Rich-T-kid
pushed a commit
to Rich-T-kid/datafusion
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 21, 2026
…che#21239) Related to apache#6880 Follow up on apache#17538 Bringing back the merge queues 🤞🏻 Last time it was painful because: - there was no `.asf.yaml` validation - if something goes wrong, we weren't able to force merge without the infra team this PR solved the first problem. As for the second one, I have the permissions to bypass so should be able to quickly revert if something ever goes bad <img width="830" height="151" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/62fb2bb5-44d8-4aae-a006-188d96728140" /> Check result: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/actions/runs/23715604583/job/69082077684?pr=21239 I also checked that CI will keep working by [merging](apache/datafusion-sandbox#197) this into our sandbox and then opening and merging [a dummy pr](apache/datafusion-sandbox#204) For now, bringing just the basic checks (in dev.yml). Will do rust.yml separately if everything goes smoothly after this one is merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow up on #17183
There are two ways to fix the "steps not run" problem:
*.mdwe won't runcheck configs.md and ***_functions.md is up-to-datealthough we should2 consumes less resources, so going with it for now
Example run: blaginin-org#3
Example md-only run: blaginin-org#4