fix(audit): handle case where AuditLog doesn't have a history record#3357
Merged
Conversation
matthewelwell
requested review from
a team and
novakzaballa
and removed request for
a team
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
gagantrivedi
approved these changes
Jan 31, 2024
Contributor
|
Uffizzi Preview |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thanks for submitting a PR! Please check the boxes below:
pre-committo check lintingdocs/if required so people know about the feature!Changes
Fixes this Sentry issue which is thrown when rendering detail page for an Audit log which doesn't have an associated history record.
How did you test this code?
Added a unit test.